↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Poor Prognosis of Pulmonary Adenosquamous Carcinoma with NRAS and HRAS Double Mutation

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Poor Prognosis of Pulmonary Adenosquamous Carcinoma with NRAS and HRAS Double Mutation
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/ott.s295813
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jidong Zhao, Xiangmei Zhang, Ming He, Xin Chen, Xing Cui, Tian Qin, Xueliang Niu, Liyan Zhao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 30%
Other 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 30%
Computer Science 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,479,802
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#316
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,011
of 526,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#12
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.