↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

SET-NUP214 Fusion Gene Involved Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adult with B Marker Expression

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
SET-NUP214 Fusion Gene Involved Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adult with B Marker Expression
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2021
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s294715
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoying Xu, Qiongli Zhai, Hao Jin, Yong Yu, Dongmei Han, Huilai Zhang, Kai Fu, Bin Meng

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,335,415
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#383
of 583 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,938
of 264,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 583 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.