| Title |
Opioid chronopharmacology: influence of timing of infusion on fentanyl’s analgesic efficacy in healthy human volunteers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s13616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Merel Boom, Joost Grefkens, Eveline van Dorp, Erik Olofsen, Gertjan Lourenssen, Leon Aarts, Albert Dahan, Elise Sarton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 34% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,648,449
of 23,287,285 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#772
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,416
of 95,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,287,285 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.