↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Opioid chronopharmacology: influence of timing of infusion on fentanyl’s analgesic efficacy in healthy human volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Opioid chronopharmacology: influence of timing of infusion on fentanyl’s analgesic efficacy in healthy human volunteers
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, September 2010
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s13616
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert Dahan

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2018.
All research outputs
#5,529,174
of 17,156,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#516
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,335
of 159,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,156,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.