↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Abnormal N-Glycosylation of Human Lens Epithelial Cells in Type-2 Diabetes May Contribute to Cataract Progression

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Abnormal N-Glycosylation of Human Lens Epithelial Cells in Type-2 Diabetes May Contribute to Cataract Progression
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2021
DOI 10.2147/opth.s300242
Authors

Ivan Ramos-Martínez, Oscar Vivanco-Rojas, Brenda Juárez-Domínguez, Luis Hernández-Zimbrón, Lenin Ochoa-de la Paz, Hugo Quiroz-Mercado, Eleazar Ramírez-Hernández, Rosario Gulias-Cañizo, Edgar Zenteno

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#10,550,235
of 17,602,756 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#902
of 2,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,251
of 258,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#19
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,602,756 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.