↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Shock Waves as a Treatment Modality for Spasticity Reduction and Recovery Improvement in Post-Stroke Adults – Current Evidence and Qualitative Systematic Review [Corrigendum]
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2021
DOI 10.2147/cia.s313296
Authors

Robert Dymarek, Kuba Ptaszkowski, Lucyna Ptaszkowska, Mateusz Kowal, Mirosław Sopel, Jakub Taradaj, Joanna Rosińczuk

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#18,350,413
of 20,677,857 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,558
of 1,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,572
of 330,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,677,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.