↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cut-Off Values of Foveal Vascular Indices in Exfoliation Glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
Title
Cut-Off Values of Foveal Vascular Indices in Exfoliation Glaucoma
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
DOI 10.2147/opth.s299080
Authors

Tolga Kocatürk, Maja Zivkovic, Volkan Dayanır

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2021.
All research outputs
#10,976,019
of 17,566,999 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,069
of 2,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,600
of 233,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,566,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.