↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cost–Benefit Analysis of Single versus Repeated Use of Single-Use Devices in Cataract Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Cost–Benefit Analysis of Single versus Repeated Use of Single-Use Devices in Cataract Surgery
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
DOI 10.2147/opth.s292849
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoum, Panagiota, Palioura, Sotiria, Naoum, Vasiliki, Nomikos, Nikos, Bachtalia, Konstantina, Zisis, Konstantinos, Athanasakis, Kostas, Kyriopoulos, John

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Researcher 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Decision Sciences 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,365,716
of 21,371,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#505
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,306
of 332,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,371,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.