| Title |
The impact of telemonitoring upon hospice referral in the community: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s36461 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Y Takahashi, Gregory J Hanson, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, Holly K Van Houten, Nilay D Shah, James M Naessens, Jennifer L Pecina |
| Abstract |
Using telemedicine for older adults with multiple comorbid conditions is a potential area for growth in health care. Given this older, ailing population, providers should discuss end-of-life care with patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 17% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#750
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,924
of 202,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.