↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The impact of telemonitoring upon hospice referral in the community: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The impact of telemonitoring upon hospice referral in the community: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s36461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Takahashi, Hanson, Thorsteinsdottir, Van Houten, Shah, Naessens, Pecina, Gregory Hanson, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, James Naessens, Jennifer Pecina, Paul Y Takahashi, Gregory J Hanson, Holly K Van Houten, Nilay D Shah, James M Naessens, Jennifer L Pecina

Abstract

Using telemedicine for older adults with multiple comorbid conditions is a potential area for growth in health care. Given this older, ailing population, providers should discuss end-of-life care with patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 20%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 20%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,124,078
of 8,729,235 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#306
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,552
of 108,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,729,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.