↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The impact of telemonitoring upon hospice referral in the community: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
The impact of telemonitoring upon hospice referral in the community: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2012
DOI 10.2147/cia.s36461
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Takahashi, Hanson, Thorsteinsdottir, Van Houten, Shah, Naessens, Pecina, Gregory Hanson, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, James Naessens, Jennifer Pecina, Paul Y Takahashi, Gregory J Hanson, Holly K Van Houten, Nilay D Shah, James M Naessens, Jennifer L Pecina

Abstract

Using telemedicine for older adults with multiple comorbid conditions is a potential area for growth in health care. Given this older, ailing population, providers should discuss end-of-life care with patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 17 18%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 16%
Psychology 7 8%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 16 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,228,320
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#574
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,366
of 160,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.