↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Are Topical Steroids a Risk Factor for Tube Exposure in Glaucoma Drainage Devices?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Are Topical Steroids a Risk Factor for Tube Exposure in Glaucoma Drainage Devices?
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2021
DOI 10.2147/opth.s281384
Authors

Alex M Ragan, Gavin Docherty, Andrew Crichton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,345,802
of 21,371,670 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,563
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,761
of 337,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#32
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,371,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.