↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The Value of Chinese Version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to Screen Anxiety and Depression in Chinese Outpatients with Atypical Chest Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
The Value of Chinese Version GAD-7 and PHQ-9 to Screen Anxiety and Depression in Chinese Outpatients with Atypical Chest Pain
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, May 2021
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s305623
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiuzhen Lin, Ousseina Bonkano, Keke Wu, Qiming Liu, Toure Ali Ibrahim, Ling Liu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Master 2 8%
Professor 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#230
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,470
of 453,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.