The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Korea, Democratic People's Republic of||1||13%|
|Members of the public||7||88%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||7||13%|
|Student > Master||5||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||11||20%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||9||16%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 2,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 440,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.