↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Gold nanoparticles-immobilized, hierarchically ordered, porous TiO2 nanotubes for biosensing of glutathione

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Gold nanoparticles-immobilized, hierarchically ordered, porous TiO2 nanotubes for biosensing of glutathione
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s80054
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganesh Venkatachalam, E Deva Kumar, S Sheen Mers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 7 21%
Researcher 6 18%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 5 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 21%
Materials Science 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,848,178
of 21,131,454 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#823
of 3,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,336
of 347,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,131,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,541 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.