Title |
Gold nanoparticles-immobilized, hierarchically ordered, porous TiO2 nanotubes for biosensing of glutathione
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s80054 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
SV Sheen Mers, Elumalai Thambuswamy Deva Kumar, V Ganesh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 23% |
Student > Master | 7 | 20% |
Researcher | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 7 | 20% |
Materials Science | 7 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,400
of 286,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#33
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.