Title |
An efficient calcium phosphate nanoparticle-based nonviral vector for gene delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s17096 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yachun Liu, Liu, He, Wang, Xiang, Shengpei Su, Zhang Jiang, Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Ukraine | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 26% |
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Engineering | 4 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#960
of 3,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,703
of 110,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,882 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.