↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in relation to corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in nonglaucomatous eyes
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s23086
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Mangouritsas, George Mangouritsas, Mantzounis, Alexopoulos

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,870,306
of 21,201,318 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#573
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,906
of 346,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,201,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.