↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The influence of operational parameters and feed preparation in a convective batch ribbon powder mixer

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The influence of operational parameters and feed preparation in a convective batch ribbon powder mixer
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, November 2011
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s25047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sin Tung Yeow, Asnawi Shahar, Norashikin Abdul Aziz, Mohd Shamsul Anuar, Yus Aniza Yusof, Farah Saleena Taip

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Researcher 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#642
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,343
of 153,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.