↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Nursing versus Usual Therapist-Led Treatment in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, June 2021
DOI 10.2147/cia.s306255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianmiao Wang, Yuping Zhang, Yuanyuan Chen, Mei Li, Hongyan Yang, Jinhua Chen, Qiaomin Tang, Jingfen Jin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 11 16%
Unspecified 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 30 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 31%
Unspecified 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 31 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#16,654,808
of 21,385,220 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,256
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,098
of 343,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,385,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.