↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification and Validation of Hemophilia-Related Outcomes on Japanese Electronic Medical Record Database (Hemophilia-REAL V Study)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Identification and Validation of Hemophilia-Related Outcomes on Japanese Electronic Medical Record Database (Hemophilia-REAL V Study)
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, July 2021
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s313371
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Fujiwara, Chisato Miyakoshi, Takashi Kanemitsu, Yasuyuki Okumura, Hironobu Tokumasu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Environmental Science 1 6%
Unknown 10 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,493,789
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#102
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,058
of 441,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.