↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Orbital fractures: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Orbital fractures: a review
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s14972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M Joseph, Ioannis P Glavas

Abstract

THIS REVIEW OF ORBITAL FRACTURES HAS THREE GOALS: 1) to understand the clinically relevant orbital anatomy with regard to periorbital trauma and orbital fractures, 2) to explain how to assess and examine a patient after periorbital trauma, and 3) to understand the medical and surgical management of orbital fractures. The article aims to summarize the evaluation and management of commonly encountered orbital fractures from the ophthalmologic perspective and to provide an overview for all practicing ophthalmologists and ophthalmologists in training.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 158 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 21%
Student > Postgraduate 24 15%
Student > Master 17 11%
Other 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 41 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,645,667
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#177
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,687
of 190,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.