↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Orbital fractures: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 1,644)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Orbital fractures: a review
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s14972
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Joseph, Ioannis P. Glavas

Abstract

THIS REVIEW OF ORBITAL FRACTURES HAS THREE GOALS: 1) to understand the clinically relevant orbital anatomy with regard to periorbital trauma and orbital fractures, 2) to explain how to assess and examine a patient after periorbital trauma, and 3) to understand the medical and surgical management of orbital fractures. The article aims to summarize the evaluation and management of commonly encountered orbital fractures from the ophthalmologic perspective and to provide an overview for all practicing ophthalmologists and ophthalmologists in training.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 23 27%
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 78%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 8 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,254,179
of 12,788,180 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#47
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,374
of 251,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,788,180 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.