| Title |
Fractionated photothermal therapy in a murine tumor model: comparison with single dose
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s205409 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Simón, Kamilla Norregaard, Jesper Tranekjær Jørgensen, Lene Broeng Oddershede, Andreas Kjaer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 10% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,450,007
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#525
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,646
of 363,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.