↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Clinical Predictors of High Blood Eosinophils in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Predictors of High Blood Eosinophils in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2021
DOI 10.2147/copd.s324511
Authors

Mei Yang, Ting Yang, Xiaoou Li, Diandian Li, Zenglin Liao, Yongchun Shen, Dan Xu, Lei Chen, Fuqiang Wen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,647,891
of 19,512,142 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,709
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,630
of 333,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,512,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.