| Title |
Clinical Characteristics and Factors Associated with Disease Progression of Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Patients in a Makeshift (Fangcang) Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s314734 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jia Liu, Jun-Fei Zhang, Han-Ning Ma, Ke Feng, Zhong-Wei Chen, Li-Shan Yang, Bin Mei, Jun-Jian Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#415,551
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#15
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,920
of 440,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.