↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Increase in direct diabetes-related costs and resource use in the 6 months following initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in five European countries: data from the INSTIGATE study

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Increase in direct diabetes-related costs and resource use in the 6 months following initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in five European countries: data from the INSTIGATE study
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s36148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Jones, Castell, Goday, Smith, Nicolay, Simpson, Salaun-Martin

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the resource use and associated direct costs of diabetes care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the 6 months before and after initiation of insulin therapy.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Ecuador 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 17 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 40%
Engineering 2 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,418,107
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#141
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,344
of 264,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.