↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Efficacy of repeated 5-fluorouracil needling for failing and failed filtering surgeries based on simple gonioscopic examination

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of repeated 5-fluorouracil needling for failing and failed filtering surgeries based on simple gonioscopic examination
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s34848
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Rashad

Abstract

To evaluate the success rate of a modified bleb needling technique in eyes with previous glaucoma surgery that had elevated intraocular pressure.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 88%
Unspecified 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,899,811
of 3,630,112 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#590
of 691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,330
of 278,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#39
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,630,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 691 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.