↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current strategies for improving access and adherence to antiretroviral therapies in resource-limited settings

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 331)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
Title
Current strategies for improving access and adherence to antiretroviral therapies in resource-limited settings
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), January 2013
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s28912
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael L Scanlon, Rachel C Vreeman

Abstract

The rollout of antiretroviral therapy (ART) significantly reduced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related morbidity and mortality, but good clinical outcomes depend on access and adherence to treatment. In resource-limited settings, where over 90% of the world's HIV-infected population resides, data on barriers to treatment are emerging that contribute to low rates of uptake in HIV testing, linkage to and retention in HIV care systems, and suboptimal adherence rates to therapy. A review of the literature reveals limited evidence to inform strategies to improve access and adherence with the majority of studies from sub-Saharan Africa. Data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials support home-based, mobile and antenatal care HIV testing, task-shifting from doctor-based to nurse-based and lower level provider care, and adherence support through education, counseling and mobile phone messaging services. Strategies with more limited evidence include targeted HIV testing for couples and family members of ART patients, decentralization of HIV care, including through home- and community-based ART programs, and adherence promotion through peer health workers, treatment supporters, and directly observed therapy. There is little evidence for improving access and adherence among vulnerable groups such as women, children and adolescents, and other high-risk populations and for addressing major barriers. Overall, studies are few in number and suffer from methodological issues. Recommendations for further research include health information technology, social-level factors like HIV stigma, and new research directions in cost-effectiveness, operations, and implementation. Findings from this review make a compelling case for more data to guide strategies to improve access and adherence to treatment in resource-limited settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Kenya 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 536 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 136 25%
Researcher 77 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 9%
Student > Bachelor 38 7%
Student > Postgraduate 35 6%
Other 109 20%
Unknown 102 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 171 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 13%
Social Sciences 61 11%
Psychology 19 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Other 88 16%
Unknown 121 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2013.
All research outputs
#5,252,918
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#42
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,287
of 292,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them