↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Study on the Effect of Two Different Transfusion Methods in Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia Induced by Non-Blood-Group Antibodies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Study on the Effect of Two Different Transfusion Methods in Neonates with Hyperbilirubinemia Induced by Non-Blood-Group Antibodies
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, October 2021
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s338874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunhai Wu, Lufei Chen, Huifang Huang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#18,835,246
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#977
of 1,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,567
of 433,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#113
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.