↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on cutaneous tensile strength during wound healing

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
The effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on cutaneous tensile strength during wound healing
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s40537
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Christoforidis, Wang, Jiang, J Willard, Pratt, Abdel-Rasoul, Roy, Powell

Abstract

To investigate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on wound tension and by histopathology during cutaneous wound healing in a rabbit model and to compare this effect to placebo intravitreal saline controls 1 and 2 weeks following intravitreal injection.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Other 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Engineering 2 18%
Decision Sciences 1 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2013.
All research outputs
#1,978,159
of 5,040,289 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#143
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,050
of 290,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,040,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.