↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reporting of adverse events related to dietary supplements to a public health center by medical staff: a survey of clinics and pharmacies

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Reporting of adverse events related to dietary supplements to a public health center by medical staff: a survey of clinics and pharmacies
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s111749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kazuki Ide, Hiroshi Yamada, Yohei Kawasaki, Marika Noguchi, Mamoru Kitagawa, Tsuyoshi Chiba, Yoshiyuki Kagawa, Keizo Umegaki

Abstract

Dietary supplements are used by >50% of the adult population in Japan, and adverse events related to these products have been reported with their increased use. Thus, an efficient system to gather and report data on these adverse events is essential. To date, however, reporting has been limited. The aim of this study was to address this deficiency by exploring the routine reporting practices of the medical staff employed at clinics or pharmacies in Japan. We conducted a survey of the procedures used by the medical staff to report adverse events related to dietary supplement intake to public health centers in Japan. The survey was conducted in Japan between November 2015 and January 2016. Based on a sample size calculation, questionnaires were administered to 1,700 potential respondents (850 pharmacists and 850 physicians). The questionnaire inquired about the sociodemographic characteristics and dietary supplement-related adverse event-reporting practices. The response rate was 34.7%, including 286 pharmacists and 304 physicians. Although >30% of the pharmacists and physicians had prior experience dealing with such adverse events, <5% had reported these to a public health center. The survey identified several barriers to reporting, such as "difficulty judging the relationship between an adverse event and the dietary supplement" and "lack of clarity regarding the severity of an adverse event". This is the first study to explore the routine reporting practices of physicians and pharmacists in terms of adverse events related to dietary supplements. Further studies are required to elucidate the severity of these adverse events. Moreover, standard reporting criteria ought to be introduced to improve public health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,874,665
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#705
of 1,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,820
of 348,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.