| Title |
A randomized crossover study comparing trehalose/hyaluronate eyedrops and standard treatment: patient satisfaction in the treatment of dry eye syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s77091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Stolz, Juan Carlos Pinto-Bonilla, Alberto Del Olmo-Jimeno, Fernando Llovet Osuna, Emiliano Hernandez Galilea |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#465
of 1,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,538
of 283,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#15
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.