The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Conivaptan: Evidence supporting its therapeutic use in hyponatremia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Core Evidence, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ce.s5997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa Li-Ng, Joseph G Verbalis |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 51% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#37
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,096
of 125,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.