↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pulse wave velocity 24-hour monitoring with one-site measurements by oscillometry

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Pulse wave velocity 24-hour monitoring with one-site measurements by oscillometry
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, February 2013
DOI 10.2147/mder.s42082
Pubmed ID
Authors

Igor N Posokhov

Abstract

This review describes issues for the estimation of pulse wave velocity (PWV) under ambulatory conditions using oscillometric systems. The difference between the principles of measuring the PWV by the standard method and by oscillometry is shown, and information on device validation studies is summarized. It was concluded that currently oscillometry is a method that is very convenient to use in the 24-hour monitoring of the PWV, is relatively accurate, and is reasonably comfortable for the patient. Several indices with the same principles as those in the analysis of blood pressure in ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure, namely the assessment of load, variability, and circadian rhythm, are proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 32%
Engineering 9 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#156
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,828
of 291,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.