↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Effect of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave on vascular regeneration after spinal cord injury and the recovery of motor function [Retraction]

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Effect of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave on vascular regeneration after spinal cord injury and the recovery of motor function [Retraction]
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s124094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Wang, Yuquan Jiang, Zheng Jiang, Lizhang Han

Abstract

[This retracts the article on p. 2189 in vol. 12, PMID: 27621630.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,853,849
of 12,517,383 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,405
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,459
of 283,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#71
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,517,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.