↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Intracorneal ring implantation using Intralase® with partial coverage of the cone in a patient after an alkaline injury

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Intracorneal ring implantation using Intralase® with partial coverage of the cone in a patient after an alkaline injury
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s26118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Canan Utine, Cakir, Mehmet Baykara

Abstract

To report the use of intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation in a case of severe corneal thinning and irregularity secondary to alkali burn.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2011.
All research outputs
#11,106,046
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,383
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,639
of 144,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#23
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.