| Title |
Effect of intratumoral administration on biodistribution of 64Cu-labeled nanoshells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s30699 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Huan Xie, Beth Goins, Ande Bao, Zheng Jim Wang, William T Phillips |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 15% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 15% |
| Engineering | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#8,577,479
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,083
of 4,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,976
of 179,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#27
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.