↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Does smoking really protect from recurrent aphthous stomatitis?

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Does smoking really protect from recurrent aphthous stomatitis?
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2010
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s15145
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sawair

Abstract

To study the effect of smoking on the prevalence of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) and to examine whether intensity and duration of smoking influence RAS lesions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Jordan 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#13,896,692
of 21,416,993 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#725
of 1,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,243
of 175,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,416,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.