RT @metagenomic_lit: The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of…
RT @metagenomic_lit: The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of…
RT @metagenomic_lit: The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of…
RT @metagenomic_lit: The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of…
The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Infectious Diseases https://t.co/mzCRUiSdcL
The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Infectious Diseases: CONCLUSION: In our study, mNGS had a higher sensitivity than CMT and… h
The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Infectious Diseases https://t.co/VeUjyH38mU https://t.co/H1FCFEtwIi
Comparison of mNGS with conventional microbiological tests IDR [ https://t.co/GXzKMauLTa ] Each test included internal control, negative control and positive control.of severe acute respiratory syndrome-Corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) with https://t.co/kvVPBLq