↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Epigenetic therapy: use of agents targeting deacetylation and methylation in cancer management

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Epigenetic therapy: use of agents targeting deacetylation and methylation in cancer management
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, March 2013
DOI 10.2147/ott.s34680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allen S Ho, Sevin Turcan, Timothy A Chan

Abstract

The emergence of epigenetic mechanisms as key regulators of gene expression has led to dramatic advances in understanding cancer biology. Driven by complex layers that include aberrant DNA methylation and histone modification, epigenetic aberrations have emerged as critical processes that disrupt cellular machinery and homeostasis. Recent discoveries have already translated into successful clinical trials and improved patient care, with several agents approved for hematologic disease and others undergoing study. As the field matures, substantial challenges persist that will require resolution. These include the need to decipher more fully the interplay between the epigenetic and genetic machinery, patient selection and improving treatment efficacy in solid tumors, and optimizing combination therapies to counteract chemoresistance and minimize adverse effects. Here, we review recent progress in epigenetic treatments and consider their implications for future cancer therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 64 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 21%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 19 27%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 3 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,823,121
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,573
of 2,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,453
of 206,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#18
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.