↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A follow-up study of the in-practice results of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of nonunion fractures

Overview of attention for article published in Orthopedic research and reviews, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
A follow-up study of the in-practice results of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in the management of nonunion fractures
Published in
Orthopedic research and reviews, December 2016
DOI 10.2147/orr.s113756
Authors

Hallie B Murray, Brian A Pethica

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Engineering 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,863,237
of 8,775,174 outputs
Outputs from Orthopedic research and reviews
#6
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,994
of 301,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopedic research and reviews
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,775,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 54th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them