↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The physiology of cardiovascular disease and innovative liposomal platforms for therapy

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
The physiology of cardiovascular disease and innovative liposomal platforms for therapy
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s30599
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo U Ruiz-Esparza, Jose H Flores-Arredondo, Victor Segura-Ibarra, Guillermo Torre-Amione, Mauro Ferrari, Elvin Blanco, Rita E Serda

Abstract

Heart disease remains the major cause of death in males and females, emphasizing the need for novel strategies to improve patient treatment and survival. A therapeutic approach, still in its infancy, is the development of site-specific drug-delivery systems. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems, such as liposomes, have evolved into robust platforms for site-specific delivery of therapeutics. In this review, the clinical impact of cardiovascular disease and the pathophysiology of different subsets of the disease are described. Potential pathological targets for therapy are introduced, and promising advances in nanotherapeutic cardiovascular applications involving liposomal platforms are presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Chemistry 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,088
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,910
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#42
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.