The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Bibliometric Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies on Manual Therapy Analgesia from 2002–2022
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s412658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xing-Chen Zhou, Yu-Bo Huang, Zhen Liu, Hong-Jiao Wu, Hua-Zhi Huang, Yu Tian, Shuang-Wei Hong, Hui-Jie Hu, Li-Jiang Lv, Zhi-Zhen Lv |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,227,242
of 24,174,783 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,090
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,269
of 357,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,174,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.