↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy: patient health education needs and views on group education

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy: patient health education needs and views on group education
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s37535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather Waterman, Lisa Brunton, Fenerty, Mottershead, Richardson, Spencer

Abstract

In this study the authors sought both to understand the health education needs of patients with glaucoma, with particular regard to adherence to glaucoma treatment, and to examine these patients' views of group education.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 21%
Researcher 5 17%
Lecturer 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Computer Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2013.
All research outputs
#9,615,745
of 12,522,829 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#750
of 1,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,350
of 148,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,522,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.