↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Double-blind, comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in Japanese patients with major depression [Corrigendum]
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s48159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinji Hashimoto, Kamijima, Nagayoshi, Koyama

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,903,124
of 3,628,597 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#572
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,593
of 85,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#48
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,628,597 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.