↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

A systematic review of patient-reported measures of burden of treatment in three chronic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Patient related outcome measures, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 149)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of patient-reported measures of burden of treatment in three chronic diseases
Published in
Patient related outcome measures, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/prom.s44694
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Eton, Tarig A. Elraiyah, Kathleen Yost, Jennifer Ridgeway, Anna Johnson, Jason Egginton, Rebecca J. Mullan, M. Hassan Murad, Patricia Erwin, Victor Montori, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Victor M Montori, David T Eton, Tarig A Elraiyah, Kathleen J Yost, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Jason S Egginton, Rebecca J Mullan, Patricia J Erwin

Abstract

Burden of treatment refers to the workload of health care and its impact on patient functioning and well-being. There are a number of patient-reported measures that assess burden of treatment in single diseases or in specific treatment contexts. A review of such measures could help identify content for a general measure of treatment burden that could be used with patients dealing with multiple chronic conditions. We reviewed the content and psychometric properties of patient-reported measures that assess aspects of treatment burden in three chronic diseases, ie, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 95 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 16 15%
Other 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 28 27%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 10 10%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,280,845
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#25
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,667
of 164,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them