| Title |
A systematic review of patient-reported measures of burden of treatment in three chronic diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient related outcome measures, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prom.s44694 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David T Eton, Tarig A Elraiyah, Kathleen J Yost, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Anna Johnson, Jason S Egginton, Rebecca J Mullan, Mohammad Hassan Murad, Patricia J Erwin, Victor M Montori |
| Abstract |
Burden of treatment refers to the workload of health care and its impact on patient functioning and well-being. There are a number of patient-reported measures that assess burden of treatment in single diseases or in specific treatment contexts. A review of such measures could help identify content for a general measure of treatment burden that could be used with patients dealing with multiple chronic conditions. We reviewed the content and psychometric properties of patient-reported measures that assess aspects of treatment burden in three chronic diseases, ie, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 37 | 26% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,390,997
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#14
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,883
of 206,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them