↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s40268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rushmia Karim, Evripidis Sykakis, Susan Lightman, Samantha Fraser-Bell

Abstract

Uveitic macular edema is the major cause of reduced vision in eyes with uveitis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 125 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Other 8 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 37 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,340,716
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#474
of 3,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,517
of 206,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.