↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for the treatment of uveitic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s40268
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Karim, Sykakis, Sue Lightman, Fraserbell

Abstract

Uveitic macular edema is the major cause of reduced vision in eyes with uveitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,927,257
of 15,625,699 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#194
of 2,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,915
of 157,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.