↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Cardiac crossroads: deciding between mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve replacement
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, February 2011
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s16420
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tillquist, Tillquist, Tom Maddox

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Iraq 1 <1%
Unknown 202 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 23%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 59 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 44 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,333,243
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#412
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,480
of 193,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them