↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Automated grading system for evaluation of ocular redness associated with dry eye
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2013
DOI 10.2147/opth.s39703
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Rodriguez, Patrick Johnston, George W. Ousler III, Mark Abelson, Smith

Abstract

We have observed that dry eye redness is characterized by a prominence of fine horizontal conjunctival vessels in the exposed ocular surface of the interpalpebral fissure, and have incorporated this feature into the grading of redness in clinical studies of dry eye.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 9 30%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 37%
Engineering 4 13%
Computer Science 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2013.
All research outputs
#2,216,952
of 6,230,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#167
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,202
of 99,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#10
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,230,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.