| Title |
Managing pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: improving outcomes for mother and baby
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s76819 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alyssa Fitzpatrick, Fadak Mohammadi, Shilpanjali Jesudason |
| Abstract |
Parenthood is a central focus for women with chronic kidney disease, but raises important fears and uncertainties about risks to their own and their baby's health. Pregnancy in women with background kidney disease, women receiving dialysis, or those with a functioning kidney transplant poses a challenging clinical scenario, associated with high maternal-fetal morbidity and potential impact on maternal renal health. Improvements in care over recent decades have led to a paradigm shift with cautious optimism and growing interest regarding pregnancies in women with chronic kidney disease. In this review, we discuss obstetric and renal outcomes, and practical aspects of management of pregnancy in this complex cohort. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 7% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,642,784
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#95
of 818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,724
of 357,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.