↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Managing pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: improving outcomes for mother and baby

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 574)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Managing pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: improving outcomes for mother and baby
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, July 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s76819
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shilpanjali Jesudason, Fadak Mohammadi, Alyssa Fitzpatrick

Abstract

Parenthood is a central focus for women with chronic kidney disease, but raises important fears and uncertainties about risks to their own and their baby's health. Pregnancy in women with background kidney disease, women receiving dialysis, or those with a functioning kidney transplant poses a challenging clinical scenario, associated with high maternal-fetal morbidity and potential impact on maternal renal health. Improvements in care over recent decades have led to a paradigm shift with cautious optimism and growing interest regarding pregnancies in women with chronic kidney disease. In this review, we discuss obstetric and renal outcomes, and practical aspects of management of pregnancy in this complex cohort.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2019.
All research outputs
#956,360
of 16,092,163 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#50
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,754
of 360,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,092,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.