↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation with high pressure strategy remains a “double edged sword”?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation with high pressure strategy remains a “double edged sword”?
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2013
DOI 10.2147/copd.s42239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Esquinas, Enrico M.Clini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 13%
Unknown 7 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 25%
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Unspecified 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#11,069,260
of 12,450,995 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,416
of 1,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,170
of 148,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#17
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,450,995 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.