↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Transferability of health technology assessments and economic evaluations: a systematic review of approaches for assessment and application

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Transferability of health technology assessments and economic evaluations: a systematic review of approaches for assessment and application
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2011
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s14404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron Goeree, Jing He, Daria O’Reilly, Jean-Eric Tarride, Feng Xie, Morgan Lim, Natasha Burke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 14%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 36 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#118
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,187
of 122,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them