↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 848)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
504 Mendeley
Title
Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, February 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s98876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sivan Zuarez-Easton, Noah Zafran, Gali Garmi, Raed Salim

Abstract

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications following cesarean section, and has an incidence of 3%-15%. It places physical and emotional burdens on the mother herself and a significant financial burden on the health care system. Moreover, SSI is associated with a maternal mortality rate of up to 3%. With the global increase in cesarean section rate, it is expected that the occurrence of SSI will increase in parallel, hence its clinical significance. Given its substantial implications, recognizing the consequences and developing strategies to diagnose, prevent, and treat SSI are essential for reducing postcesarean morbidity and mortality. Optimization of maternal comorbidities, appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, and evidence-based surgical techniques are some of the practices proven to be effective in reducing the incidence of SSI. In this review, we describe the biological mechanism of SSI and risk factors for its occurrence and summarize recent key clinical trials investigating preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative practices to reduce SSI incidence. It is prudent that the surgical team who perform cesarean sections be familiar with these practices and apply them as needed to minimize maternal morbidity and mortality related to SSI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 504 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 503 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 14%
Student > Master 64 13%
Student > Postgraduate 32 6%
Researcher 28 6%
Other 18 4%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 231 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 1%
Engineering 6 1%
Other 32 6%
Unknown 242 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#725,504
of 24,679,965 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#47
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,372
of 429,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,679,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.