↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Language impairment in Alzheimer's disease and benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Language impairment in Alzheimer's disease and benefits of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s39959
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Ferris, Martin Farlow, Steven H Ferris

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is characterized by progressively worsening deficits in several cognitive domains, including language. Language impairment in Alzheimer's disease primarily occurs because of decline in semantic and pragmatic levels of language processing. Given the centrality of language to cognitive function, a number of language-specific scales have been developed to assess language deficits throughout progression of the disease and to evaluate the effects of pharmacotherapy on language function. Trials of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, used for the treatment of clinical symptoms of Alzheimer's disease, have generally focused on overall cognitive effects. However, in the current report, we review data indicating specific beneficial effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors on language abilities in patients with Alzheimer's disease, with a particular focus on outcomes among patients in the moderate and severe disease stages, during which communication is at risk and preservation is particularly important.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 224 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Master 23 10%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Neuroscience 15 7%
Linguistics 13 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 64 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,143,393
of 22,150,339 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#117
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,771
of 177,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,150,339 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.